Examiner

Streaming Radio

Real Estate
Mortgage
Automotive
Employment
Services
Classifieds
Market Place
Media Kit
News
HOME
Front Page
Bulletin Board
Letters
Editorials
Obituaries
Schools
Sports
Video Index
GMN Photo Page
Online Obituary Submission
Featured Special Sections
Monmouth West & Ocean County
Health & FItness Guide
About Us
Archive
Contact us
Services
Advertiser Index
Greg Bean's Podcasts
News Archive

Copyright©
2000 - 2008
GMN
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use

RSS
RSS Feed


Newspaper web site content management software and services


DMCA Notices
Front PageMay 24, 2007 


Roosevelt's lone liquor license remains inactive
Former deli owners still own license but will have to pay $172 more this year

ROOSEVELT - Although the borough's only liquor license is inactive, the Borough Council has unanimously agreed to raise its annual fee by 20 percent.

At the May 14 Borough Council meeting, an ordinance "concerning alcoholic beverages" was passed, amending the borough's previous ordinance to allow the annual license fee for a plenary retail distribution license to rise to $1,033 per year.

Borough Clerk Krystyna Olejnik said that last year the fee was $861. According to Olejnik, state law allows the license fee to be raised by 20 percent each year.

The Rossi family, who previously owned the delicatessen located next to the post office, still owns the liquor license. Mi Rancho, the new business at the former site of Rossi's, does not sell alcohol.

Councilwoman Peggy Malkin asked Borough Attorney Richard Shaklee if the town can rescind the license and sell it to someone else, since the Rossi family no longer resides in Roosevelt.

Shaklee said that the Bureau of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) looked at the paperwork and considers this liquor license a "pocket license," which is not attached to a specific place.

Shaklee said the liquor license can remain inactive for two full terms. After that, the ABC could issue a special ruling in order for it to be renewed while it is still inactive, according to Shaklee.

Shaklee said that by the end of July 2008, the liquor license will have been inactive for two full terms. He said the paperwork on the license indicated that it was active in 2005.

In 2008, the ABC would rule on the license as a matter of course, according to Shaklee.

Borough Administrator William Schmeling said the license fee may be raised irrespective of ownership.

Mayor Elsbeth "Beth" Battel said that even though the license is currently not in use, the fee still creates revenue for the borough.